翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Australian cricket team in New Zealand in 1949–50 ・ Australian cricket team in New Zealand in 1956–57 ・ Australian cricket team in New Zealand in 1959–60 ・ Australian cricket team in New Zealand in 1966–67 ・ Australian cricket team in New Zealand in 1969–70 ・ Australian Committee on Computation and Automatic Control ・ Australian Commonwealth Games Association ・ Australian Commonwealth Horse ・ Australian Commonwealth Naval Board ・ Australian Commonwealth Party ・ Australian Communications and Media Authority ・ Australian Communist Party v Commonwealth ・ Australian Community Television Alliance ・ Australian Company Number ・ Australian Competition and Consumer Commission ・ Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Baxter Healthcare Pty Ltd ・ Australian Competitive Grants Register ・ Australian Computational and Linguistics Olympiad ・ Australian Computer Museum Society ・ Australian Computer Society ・ Australian Computers in Education Conference ・ Australian Conservation Foundation ・ Australian Conservative Party ・ Australian Constitution (Public Record Copy) Act 1990 ・ Australian Constitutional Convention 1998 ・ Australian constitutional law ・ Australian constitutional referendums, 1898–1900 ・ Australian Construction Achievement Award ・ Australian Construction Contracts ・ Australian Consumer Law Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Baxter Healthcare Pty Ltd ： ウィキペディア英語版 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Baxter Healthcare Pty Ltd ''Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Baxter Healthcare Pty Ltd'' (''Baxter'') was a decision of the High Court of Australia, which ruled on 29 August 2007 that Baxter Healthcare Proprietary Limited, a tenderer for various government contracts, was bound by the ''Trade Practices Act 1974'' (TPA, Australian legislation governing anti-competitive behaviour) in its trade and commerce in tendering for government contracts. More generally, the case concerned the principles of derivative governmental immunity:〔There are differing opinions whether the immunity in Australia should be referred to as "Crown immunity" or "governmental immunity". For example, refers to governmental immunity; while refers to Crown immunity. Without judging the merits of which term is more appropriate, this article uses "governmental immunity"〕 whether the immunity of a government from a statute extends to third parties that conduct business with the government. The High Court's judgment marked a successful appeal for the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, the Australian regulator of anti-competitive conduct, having lost at first instance and on appeal in the Federal Court of Australia. The ACCC was again successful when the case was remitted to the Federal Court for reconsideration, ending eight years of litigation between the parties. The High Court's judgment was received as a significant precedent in the law of derivative governmental immunity in Australia. ==Background== 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Baxter Healthcare Pty Ltd」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.